![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A great game and a good brawl.
Both sides seem to pull out all the stops.
This game could be seen as a "Grudge Match" and a continuation of their FIDE World Championship Match. (Ponomariov won in January, 2002.)
This game was played at the great "Super-GM" tournament of Linares, Spain. (ESP) I believe this event is traditionally played in Feb/Mar, every year.
1. e4
e6; 2.
d4
d5; 3.
Nc3,
This allows Black to play the
Winawer Variation of the French.
(The French Defense.)
[ White could play the Tarrasch
Variation with: 3.Nd2!?,
This was (is) a
big favorite of
Karpov's. So great was his
influence that in the early 90's,
I went through about 6 Informants -
and found NOT ONE example
of
3. Nc3, between two 'Top-50' GM's!!].
3...Bb4; 4.
e5
c5; 5.
a3
Bxc3+; 6.
bxc3
Ne7; 7.
Qg4
0-0!?;
When I was playing these lines
all the time in tournament play,
these lines
were considered pretty risky.
Of all
GM's who have consistently played the French Defense in the past,
only Korchnoi used to
be brave enough to play this line. (Regularly.)
[ The main line is:
7...Qc7; {Diagram?}
This move is more or less forced.
Weakening the dark-squares by
... g6?!; is considered foolhardy.
8.Qxg7
Rg8; 9.Qxh7
cxd4;
10.Ne2
Nbc6; 11.f4
Bd7;
12.Qd3
dxc3; {"comp."}
Black has good counter-play and compensation for the material
sacrificed.
(This line has been played literally hundreds of times
at the GM level.)
Interesting is: 7...Kf8!? {Unclear?} ].
8. Bd3
f5!?; (K-side space)
This looks natural, but at the
same time opens more lines to
the Black King.
This could be even be a dubious ... or just a plain bad move.
[ Maybe Black could play: 8...c4!?; blocking the Q-side.
Or 8...Qa5!? (Maybe - '!') with an active game for Black.
I once won a tournament game (against an amatuer) that went
something like:
8...a6; 9.a4
Nbc6; 10.Nf3
Bd7; 11.Bg5!,
This is nice, but ...
(Even
better for White is: 11.Bxh7+!!, ("+/-")
White has a winning attack.
{I once defeated a U.S.C.F.
Senior-Master with this idea,
in an actual
over-the-board,
tournament game!})
11...Rb8?; (Ugh.)
Terrible, Black did not even
see the threat.
(Much
better was: 11...Qa5!; or
even 11...Kh8!?)
12.Bf6
g6; 13.Qg5
Qe8;
14.Qh6
Nf5;
Now this isn't much help. 15.Bxf5, and Black Resigned.
1-0
I only show this game to clearly
illustrate what a strong attack
White
has ... most of the time he
does not even have to castle. ].
9. exf6
Rxf6; 10.
Bg5, "+/="
White is clearly just a little bit better now.
[ 10.Qg3!? ].
10...Rf7; {Box.}
This is forced.
[ 10...e5?; 11.Qh4, "+/-" ].
11. Qh5!
g6; 12.
Qd1!
Nbc6;
Now Black's K-side is riddled
with holes, and potential targets
for attack.
13.Nf3
Qf8!?;
This looks too passive to me.
[Maybe just a little bit better is: 13...Qa5! (Counter-play.) ].
14.0-0
c4; ('!?') 15.
Be2
h6!?;
Black gains space and drives back
the dangerous White Bishop. He also
makes
a bid to exert more influence
on the dark-squares ... yet I think he
tampers with
his Kingside way too
much.
[ 15...Nf5!? ].
16. Bc1!,
Now the a3-f8 diagonal is
available to White's QB.
16...Bd7; 17.
Ne1!?;
I am not sure what the purpose
of this move is.
(Is White preparing to re-shuffle all of his pieces?)
[ Seemingly better is: 17.Rb1!, "+/=" grabbing the half-open file. ].
17...g5; 18.
g3!?;
White may be preparing to put
his KB on g2. (Re-deployment.)
He is also looking at a possible
move of f2-f4.
[ Maybe better is: 18.Bh5!? ].
18...Nf5!?;
Now I am not sure about this move.
[ Maybe better is:
18...Rd8!; with the idea of:
...e5! with an attack
on
White's King! ].
19. Ng2
Qg7; 20.
f4
Nd6; 21.
Qe1
b5!?; "~"
Interesting, but ...
[ I like : 21...Qg6!;
"=" {Diagram}
This seems
to be much better than the game. ].
The position is now
almost
completely equal.
22. fxg5!
Rxf1+; 23.
Bxf1
hxg5; 24.
Ne3
Rf8; 25.
Bg2
a5;
26. Bd2
Qg6; 27.
Ng4
Rf5!?;
(Maybe - '?!')
Black defends his King-side
with this move.
But this idea may be bad.
[ Seemingly better is: 27...Qxc2!; 28.Bxg5
Qg6; "=" This idea could be
good, basically Black has liquidated a big liability - his isolated KNP. ]
Now according to the computers,
White has a significant advantage.
Both
of White's Bishops work well,
and his pieces are well-posted.
Additionally
Black has many
weaknesses and his light-squared
Bishop is VERY bad.
And to top it
all off, Black's pieces now have little
scope. (Passive.)
28. Qe3
Kg7; 29.
Rb1
Kh7;
Black is very passive here. He must
sit and wait for White to decide what
he is going to do. (Not a good situation to be in!)
Now White correctly (and very
brilliantly) opens the game for
his Bishops
and his Rook. (And his other pieces too!)
30. a4!
bxa4; 31.
Bc1
Rf7; 32.
Ba3
Qxc2?!; (Maybe - '?')
To me, opening the game now,
when White seems completely
ready for
it - is very, very risky.
In actuality, this may be the losing move!
I can only guess ... but I have
read a great deal about Ivanchuk, and
I have
also seen him play. (A couple of times when I was in the military, and
once I
watched one of his games at the New York Open one year.) He is very prone to
time pressure, and this
move may be a result of that.
[ Surely (much) better is: 32...Nf5!?; "~" ].
33. Rc1
Qf5; 34.
Bh3!, (Nice!)
This is correct, although at first
glance this might seem a very
bad square
for this Bishop.
Now the threat is a discovered
attack, (Ne5) White will lose his
Bishop,
but win the Black Rook on f7.
(This may have been the move that Ivanchuk overlooked.)
[ 34.h3!? ].
Now Black has to move his Knight.
(Or give away a piece for free.)
34...Ne4[]; 35.
Ne5
Qf2+; 36.
Qxf2
Rxf2; 37.
Nxd7
Ra2;
A piece down, Black desperately
seeks counterplay.
Now all the computers agree
that Black is lost.
38. Bc5
Nd2; 39.
Bg2
a3; 40.
Nf8+
Kh6; 41.
Re1
e5!?;
Black tries to mix it up. (What else can he do?)
42. dxe5
g4; 43.
e6
Nf3+; 44.
Bxf3
gxf3; 45.
Kf1!, ("+/-")
Black Resigns. 1-0
A very exciting game, rich in
fighting content and different
ideas - ideas that
are often
radically different from those
that are 'the norm' in chess.
I commented and played over this
game one night on a Spanish chess
server
just a few days after it was
played. As a result, I received over
60 requests to
annotate this game. Enjoy!
1 - 0
This game can be downloaded free in The Week In Chess. (The old site.)
Game
first posted on my web site, March 25th, 2002.
(This page last updated: Wednesday; November 15th, 2003.)
***
(I borrowed from a very old file to do the comments on the opening.)
This game is a shortened
version of the game as it exists in my database.
(I have shortened it just slightly for publication.)
If you would like a copy of the fully annotated version
of this game to study, please contact
me.
Click HERE to return (or go to), my AF Downloads page on "Recent GM Games."
Click HERE to return (or go to) to my 'AF Downloads' "Home Page."
Click HERE to return (or go to), to my GeoCities "Home Page."
Click HERE to go to, (or return to), my: (GeoCities) "Best (All-Time) [Chess] Games Page."
Click
HERE
to go to my (GeoCities) "Best
Short Games Page."
(If you liked this game, you will enjoy the many games that are
available on this page.)
Click HERE to go to, or return to, my: (GeoCities) "Best All-Time [Chess] Moves Page."
Click
HERE to go to,
"La Mecca."
(An on-line, chess encyclopedia.)
Copyright
(c) A.J. Goldsby I. © A.J. Goldsby,
1985 - 2013.
Copyright © A.J. Goldsby, 2014. All Rights Reserved.
|